Well, it seems there are some legal challenges already to a couple of our ballot propositions.
**
Regarding Proposition 200, The Arizona Republic reports that, "nearly 90 percent (13,482 of 15,059) of the initiatives circulated with the petitions said the measure would require proof of citizenship for 'public welfare benefits.' The ballot language officially states 'public benefits,' a broader term that has caused intense debate over exactly what benefits would be affected." Hmm...I just said something like that in my last post.
***
There is also legal challenge involving Proposition 400, according to another article in the Arizona Republic, although it sounds like there is no real basis to this one other than dirty politics. But you know what, I have an idea...check out my next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment